Parent Advocates
Search All  
 
Lawrence Scott III, Agent of the NYC DOE Office of Special Investigations (OSI), Sexually Assaults Teacher Natalya Sokolson-Gordon at Her School, PS. 329 in Coney Island, Brooklyn
The story of the sexual assault on Natalya Sokolson-Gordon by OSI investigator Lawrence I. Scott III during the school day in a room at the school, PS 329 in Coney Island, is shocking indeed. Luckily, everything is on tape and in print, and multiple people have this documentation of Investigator's Scott's absolute stupidity and abusive conduct. OSI Investigator Lawrence Scott III texted Natalya his sex desires, and I have seen and heard all of it as Natalya's advocate and 3020-a paralegal. We believe that the information below on this blog is important for the public to know.
          
Lawrence Scott III, Agent of the NYC DOE Office of Special Investigations (OSI), Sexually Assaults Teacher Natalya Sokolson-Gordon at Her School, PS. 329 in Coney Island, Brooklyn

See NYC Rubber Room Reporter

The story of the sexual assault on Natalya Sokolson-Gordon by OSI investigator Lawrence I. Scott III during the school day in a room at the school, PS 329 in Coney Island, is shocking indeed. Luckily, everything is on tape and in print, and multiple people have this documentation of Investigator's Scott's absolute stupidity and abusive conduct. OSI Investigator Lawrence Scott III texted Natalya his sex desires, and I have seen and heard all of it as Natalya's advocate and 3020-a paralegal. We believe that the information below on this blog is important for the public to know.

§130.52 Forcible touching. A person is guilty of forcible touching when such person intentionally, and for no legitimate purpose, forcibly touches the sexual or other intimate parts of another person for the purpose of degrading or abusing such person; or for the purpose of gratifying the actor’s sexual desire. For the purposes of this section, forcible touching includes squeezing, grabbing or pinching. Forcible touching is a class A misdemeanor.(Eff.11/1/03,Ch.264,L.2003)

In the past several weeks I have spoken with many people, including past and former teachers, parents and even children (parents allowed me to speak with them). For now I will keep their identities anonymous. All were fearful and upset as they recapped the horrors that lay within the walls of PS 329. They told me about the cruelty and abuse that not only the teachers, but the children are subjected to daily. Many have reported Ms. Marbury but never heard back from anyone.

Several teachers were afraid that they too will end up "like Ms. Gordon."

One teacher told me, "if you were seen speaking to Ms. Gordon or helping her in any way you immediately became a target of harassment". "I don't understand", another teacher said, "Ms.Gordon did so much for Ms. Marbury personally and professionally, they were friends." While another teacher was extremely upset for her colleagues, saying, "I cant believe she (Ms. Marbury) gave so many U ratings to good teachers for no reason , but to cover up her own (Ms. Marbury's) negligence. Some teachers who were already removed from their classes were forced to sit in and clean up dirty, old, 5x4 book closets, all year long. And no one wants to expose what is happening at the school to children with Individualized Education Plans (IEPs). Special needs children have service providers and certified special education teachers, or at least are supposed to, and this is protected by Federal Law. PS 329 does not honor these rights, and special education students are sprinkled throughout the school in classrooms without a certified teacher helping them. New York State, where are you?

I spoke with a child who told me that Ms. Marbury and Ms. Lafontant took her/him and many of her/his classmates out of class and made them write lies about their teacher. Many of them were frightened by Principal Marbury and AP Lafontant who threatened them and told them they had to write what they were told. The children said that they told the investigator what Ms. Marbury and Ms.Lafontant were doing.

However... Where is that report?

Several parents asked for transfers in fear of their children's welfare but were denied by the Dept of Education regional office. One parent told me, "Ms. Marbury treats the parents as if we are some stupid people from the projects who do not know any better, we are not!" "While at other times she threatens us with her husband. I'm not scared, I grew up in Coney Island, I know her husband".

There are many people at fault in this matter, but most alarming is the abuse of authority seen in the actions of Lawrence Scott III. The New York Post editorialized in the December 29, 2013 article about Investigator Scott that this matter will forever undermine the integrity of the DOE’s Office of Special Investigations and change the perception the general public has of the "investigators" who work for the City of New York. This goes all the way to the top, Rose Gill Hearn and the Department of Investigation (DOI). who knew, or should have known, this assault could happen, given past mistakes and abuses of power which have been documented and sent to these chiefs previously. Instead, the Chiefs of these agencies go after the victim of assaults and demand that they keep quiet until they "finish their investigation". This is the reason the rubber rooms were filled with people, all waiting until the Gotcha Squad told them what they were guilty of.
I wrote this in 2009:

The New York City Board of Education seems not to understand the meaning of the word "investigation" as "a systematic, minute, and thorough attempt to learn the facts about something complex or hidden; it is often formal and official". I say this because the NYC BOE just doesn't get it right, much of the time. The agencies involved, Office of Legal Services, Office of Equal Opportunity, and Special Commissioner of Investigation, are all funded by the New York City Board of Education. (See NYC Rubber Room Reporter article News To Use: New York City Government Payroll, FOIL, PERB, Budget, and More" We know what this means. If Joel Klein says "punish the teacher...", then the 'facts' will conveniently fall into the column titled "guilty". The act that the teacher did to be found "guilty" does not really matter, and often the character of the teacher or past history of stellar performance doesn't really impact the conclusion either. By the way, Ms. Sacco told me she has never received a "U" (unsatisfactory) rating for her teaching.

Mr. Dennis Boyles, an investigator paid also by the NYC Board of Education, told a teacher in the presence of his UFT representative that he, Boyles, had been asked by the Principal to come to the school "to find him (the teacher) guilty". His subsequent testimony at this teacher's 3020-a was ridiculous, and embarrassing for OSI, his employer. Here is his payroll entry in the article on this blog "New To Use": Boyles, Dennis; Education Admin, Department of; Annual $66,988 .

Several years ago I brought two 15 year-old girls to be interviewed by Mr. Dennis Boyles after both were beaten at their school in Brooklyn. Between the two girls' testimonies, Mr. Boyles told me, "listen, it only cost me $5,000 to get my 15-year old daughter out of trouble". I believe he was suggesting that the girls pay $5,000 in order to be found innocent. No one paid anything, and both girls were suspended from their school for beating their attacker, who didn't have a scratch on him. Both girls had been sent to the hospital. I researched the man who hit the two girls and found that he had a long criminal record of harassment at the Brooklyn NYPD. The NYC BOE had allowed him to take a position at Sheepshead Bay High School without checking his criminal record? Was Mr. Dennis Boyles suggesting that I give him money to let the girls go free? Was this a "You help me and I'll help you" scheme? I believe so.

If you question or make a complaint to any of the above agencies, you will be investigated, and/or charged with "impeding an investigation" ....whatever that means. You will be put into 3020-a (if you are tenured) or discontinued if you have probationary status. No employee of the DOE should contact an "investigator" for any reason. People should instead give all the information to a third party person who can make the complaint, and also go to the District Attorney. Not the police, who will not file any complaint against a principal. There is nothing fair or impartial about this process. People are being falsely accused, framed, set up, terminated, destroyed, all for no reason other than an administrator decided he/she is not to be in the school for a week, month, or forever. Simple, basta cosi. And I'm just talking about those people who are not guilty of anything. But the NYSUT/UFT "don't talk to them" directive is wrong too. They are not the only people who can be The Gotcha Squad. You can be too.

What bothers the heck out of me is that on January 15, 2013 Salema Marbury put Natalya and Scott in an isolated room on the first floor of PS 329 that had been damaged by Sandy. She put the two of them alone in that room, for Scott to interrogate Natalya. Did she have an agenda in doing this? During the school day?

Victims of harassment inside the Department of Education are victimized over and over again until they give up, resign, retire, or run. That's what happened in this case, almost.

When I was hired by the UFT in August 2007, I was hired to work 14 hours/week on finding out who was in the "rubber rooms" and to help any member who needed assistance. When Mike Mulgrew took over I was told not to email, speak to, or otherwise help anyone, and just sit in my office, as everyone charged was always guilty, and I mustn't get in the way ("of the Department") . Liz Perez, a Brooklyn UFT Special Representative, even told the principal at the 25 Chapel Street rubber room to spy on me, and make sure that I was not giving any advice to members on my weekly visits.

This is why I no longer work for the UFT, and have started my own advocacy organization (ADVOCATZ, part of my company Theater Kids, Inc.). People undergoing an "investigation" should not be left in the dark about what they are being investigated for.

The word "investigator" is a frightening word. If you hear "An investigator is here to speak with you", ? this starts, in most people, the heart beating quickly, the palms of your hands getting sweaty, and then fear becomes the taste in your mouth. People who are put into the unfortunate position of being "under investigation" usually do whatever they are told, because they are threatened that there will be horrible consequences to follow if they do not cooperate. This is what Scott made Natalya believe.

But Natalya told her NYSUT Attorney, and then shockingly received a brush off from him.
In this matter, NYSUT Attorney Mitch Rubenstein (who edits a law blog and makes a very good salary, pictured at left) told Natalya that her 3020-a charges filed two weeks after she rebuffed Scott in the school (January 15, 2013), had "nothing to do with her 3020-a specifications". Natalya fired him.

One way to defend yourself against these people is to tape everyone with whom you are in a conversation.

Just like Natalya did, and Teddy, and David, and hundreds of others.

Natalya supports this: "NY is one of 38 states that allows 1st person recording. Meaning that if I am part of the conversation and as long as I know I'm recording, it is totally legal. I do not have to tell the other person. The forged, inappropriate internal investigations based on false accusations and allegations had become a part of my bi-weekly routine. I had my recorder handy, for anytime and anyplace Principal Salema Marbury, and AP Lisa Lafontant, would yell and scream at me, at the students and at other staff. But Ms. Marbury believed that I was secretly taping, and wanted me to stop. It became so bad that during the principal's so-called "internal investigations", I was not allowed to bring in my pocketbook, a jacket or any garment that covered me. I was practically strip searched at the beginning of every internal investigation which took place in the principal's office. I was asked to show my pockets and turn around. It was quite comical, because I still had recording devices. Even in my sock. And every single internal investigation and abuse towards children and teachers was taped! However Salema Marbury thought otherwise, fortunately. She yelled and screamed, threatened and jumped in my face, during these internal meetings. Many times she threw me out and did not allow me to speak when she did not like my answers. Or I gave answers that contradicted her lies. Answers that pointed out her negligence with the children. I have over 107 recordings. Funny though, the disciplinary letters for file and the corporal punishment allegations that were falsely written by Salema Marbury and AP Lafontant were never based on the content of the actual investigation, which is available in audio format, but were based on lies, events and instances that never took place. Lies! ...that for some reason went unnoticed by the numerous complaints that I made to SCI."

Ive seen this happen to women charged with all kinds of allegations of misconduct throughout the 10 years I have been watching this process (3020-a) and these people (the "investigators"). Recently, Scott said that the charges against Natalya are "irrelevant" to the assault. SCI was given all the text messages and audio messages from/to Scott by Natalya in October, 2013, when she went to their offices at 80 Maiden Lane to file a complaint against Scott. He resigned (or was fired).

I first met Natalya on December 3, 2013, when I decided to attend the 3020-a of my friend Francesco Portelos at 49-51 Chambers Street, 6th Floor. Francesco also, by the way, was threatened by "investigator Scott":

"When I found he wanted to speak to me in private, I started recording. I don’t like doing it, but I do not trust investigators. It’s a good thing I did, because if I didn’t, people may not believe that he threatened me.
Not a “nice guy”? What does that mean?"

On December 3 I was speaking to another person who was a friend of Francesco's, when suddenly a woman I had never met before but who looked very stressed sat down and said "I'm so sorry to bother you, I hate to interrupt, but I heard you talking about tapes, audio, video, and I have some of those." Boy, did she. Turns out she taped the principal, and all her meetings, for a year, as well as Lawrence Scott doing some very improper things. The audio of Lawrence Scott trying to get her to touch his penis is particularly disgusting. And then there are the texts. Many of them. Natalya hired me on the spot to help her. I successfully put off proceeding with the resignation.

The woman told me her name was Natalya Sokolson, and she taught for 20 years. I asked her what her case was about and who her attorney was, she told me that she had fired NYSUT Attorney Mitch Rubenstein, and then the sad tale began. That evening I began to look into the school and people involved. After speaking with many teachers and parents who are or were at the school (all of whom will remain anonymous) I was particularly shocked at the street language of Principal Salema Marbury, and the manner in which she put revenge before the health, safety and welfare of the children in her building. A parent says that her child's 5th grade teacher is often drunk in class. The principal has done nothing about it.

Natalya was hired by Principal Salema Marbury to teach at PS 329 in 2004. Salema was friends with Natalya's sister-in-law, Tina Murlin-Sokolson.

Natalya was assigned a position in PS 329 as a computer cluster teacher and she and Salema became very close friends.

P.S. 329 is a sexed-up school, more like a 'Peyton Place'. I call it that because it seems that too many teachers are sleeping with too many wives and husbands of other teachers and administrators. We had to make a chart to keep all the sex partners straight. Take the Principal, for instance. She was Salema Dawson until she married the PS 329 Parent Coordinator, who is now the Guidance Counselor at PS 39, Don Marbury. My sources tell me that they had to "do their thing" in the school building because he was married at the time.

Salema's husband is the brother of sports star Stephon Marbury. Several sources at the school told me that Don Marbury told staff at the school, when he and Salema Dawson were dating, 'please do not try to contact me for half an hour, at least - I will be "banging the principal."' They married and he left the school. He went to PS 39, where he is a Guidance Counselor. PS 329 sold his bother's brand, Starbury, and uniforms to the parents and children.

On or about July 2009 Natalya helped set up and decorate Footprints cafe in Coney Island for Salema's bridal shower. On Aug 9, 2009 she attended and photographed Salema's and Don's wedding at the Riviera.

She even photographed the bride at home prior to wedding. In Sept 2009 Salema brought Natalya back gifts from their honeymoon. Then, Natalya's brother found out about the affair his wife Tina Murlin Sololson was having with the gym teacher. Natalya was accused of telling her brother about the affair, starting the harassment by Salema.

On March 6, 2012, Natalya's students were on a school bus outside the school waiting to start a trip to the Staten Island Chocolate factory when a man in a car tried to drive by the bus. Natalya ran over to the car to stop him, and she fell and badly hurt herself, but waited to get treatment until the trip was over so that the children would not be prevented from going. A line of duty injury (LODI) claim was submitted and was denied. Then Natalya received a letter of a 3020a regarding time and attendance resulting from the principal denying her LODI.

On March 13, 2012 Natalya was questioned about her concern about illegal fundraising through the Young Entrepreneurs Program (YEP). All files and receipts were taken from her with out proper accountability. All money made during the sales were taken from her and never seen again. Students lessons and feedback were stolen out of her room by teacher Ms. Smith who Natalya caught going into her classroom with an administrative key(opens all doors) and looking through her files. The air conditioners promised in the flyer at right were never seen.

On March 14, 2012 Natalya had a UFT Meeting with Judy Gerowitz regarding concerns in the school building regarding the handling of situations by Salema. Immediately after the meeting several teachers told Ms. Marbury of what was said in the meeting and Marbury began to immediately harass Natalya.

The parent of the missing child told me that her daughter was given to another parent, and Marbury did not seem to take control of the situation. The parent, Ms. Torres, went to the Department of Education to transfer her daughter, and they told her they had lengthy procedures to follow. She went to the media and her daughter was transferred out the next day.

At the April 24, 2012 Time and attendance hearing Natalya was fined $3000. However, the Principal tampered with her personnel file and withheld LODI information. The LODI in question was overturned in October of 2013. Natalya's salary and days were to be returned to her, but have not been returned, yet. (I and Natalya went to see Michelle Nacht at OPI the end of December).

On April 25, 2012 Natalya was given a letter to file for using the bathroom during the 37.5 min after school program, and leaving her 4 children with a teacher next door for 2 min. The teachers in the building were horrified by this rule, and one teacher told me, "Marbury said it was only for (Natalya)." She was given another letter for the same crime on May 6, 2012.

April 27, 2012: There was an incident of a missing child and items stolen from the classroom, as well as children accessing a closed classroom with an administrative key. Natalya questioned the children and explained the concern for their safety to them and then reported the incident to AP Lisa Lafontant assistant principal.
??
Lafontant accompanied Marbury as she went around the school questioning and telling Y workers to write statements against Natalya if they valued their jobs, to turn the situation against Natalya for being verbally abusive and embarrassing the children in front of everyone. One parent I spoke to was very angry about this and her child was very upset, and she refused to let her child participate.

During this time OSI Investigator Thomas Rickey and then Dennis Boyles, came to investigate Principal Marbury on misappropriation of funds, stealing school time, and using teachers to do personal favors for her during school time. The YEP program was linked to illegal fundraisers and missing money. No report has ever been seen from OSI. After Natalya answered the questions Ms Marbury went around telling people that she wrote the letter to OSI, however the letter contained instances that she had no clue about.

Natalya was the schools photographer, video person, tech teacher and web site developer, as well as many other roles. At a UFT meeting on May 15, 2012, with UFT Representative Judy Gerowitz and the PS 329 Chapter Leader, regarding the disclosure of her personal business in a staff meeting and several other issues concerning Natalya's allegations and harassment, Dean Barbara Straughter asked Natalya to take pictures in the auditorium. Immediately following this meeting the principal, Salema, called Natalya's classroom during a math lesson and she was yelling at her about taking pictures. At 1:45PM Ms Marbury stormed into the classroom and began to tell at the children about service points towards graduation. Alleging that a parent complained that their child didn't want to do service she continued to yell "who told their parent that? Oh you're too good to clean?" She then went around the room yelling at each student and proceeded to degrade one student by calling her spoiled and asking her if she was too good to clean. Salema then snatched the school camera that Natalya always used from her desk and left the room yelling and being verbally abusive to Natalya in front of the children. "I could not finish my lesson because the kids were upset and the student was hysterically crying," Natalya told me.

I looked Barbara Straughter up, and it seems that NYSED has no record of her being certified to be a teacher or a
Dean in a school from August 2012 until February 1, 2014. PS 329 has no SAVE Room.

On May 22, 2012 Natalya was summoned to a disciplinary meeting once again. Ms Marbury had A PTA parent write a letter of lies about her, promising the parent that she would get the child into a better JHS than the one assigned. That same day Natalya reported to the UFT that on May 14, 2012 Salema called a new safety Officer "Uncle Ben" during a staff meeting. Natalya reported her. Salema then told security that Natalya could not be in the lobby because the parents said that Natalya dances in a local bar and that they are disgusted by seeing her in the lobby. During the meeting, when Natalya asked Salema why she was telling people that she stripped at a location bar., ."She yelled and threw me out if the meeting." Disciplinary letter to file given to Natalya on May 31, 2012.

On May 30, 2012, a child was called out of lunch and told to write a statement about Natalya by AP Lafontant, but the child said his father would not let him write false things about his teacher. Natalya reported this to Ms. Brown, the Children's First Network (CFN) leader.

The next day Natalya was served with new disciplinary charges and a letter to file after lunch. She read it during her prep period right before last period. On May 31, when during instruction Natalya lost consciousness and when the paramedics arrived, the paramedics called ms Gordon's brother at work off her cell phone, he was listed as primary contact via iPhone emergency app. When her brother, Mr. Sokolson (who had 2 children as students in the building, and his wife Ms. Tina Murlin-Sokolson is still at the school) arrived at the ps329 building, after signing in at the front desk and obtaining a pass, he proceeded to the main office. Once there he asked Ms. Anita Reynolds , the secretary on the whereabout of his sister. At which point Ms. Marbury ran out of her office yelling and threatening Mr. Sokolson to get out of the building, without providing any information on her whereabouts. (Natalya was still being cared for by the paramedics and was still on the floor in the school building). Ms. Marbury threw him out of the building and filed a police report against him. Fortunately he also recorded the whole incident, however when he reported this to SCI he was told that they gave the case to OSI who then turned it over to Ms. DeMola superintendent, who then told Natalya's brother that the case was closed and and no further information nor explanation was given. No one even bothered to listen to the audio.

Natalya was hospitalized. Upon returning to school she was denied LODI. Natalya was served with a disciplinary letter for insubordination claiming that she failed to sign and return the disciplinary letter given to her on may 31, 2012 as she was being wheeled out of the school building by paramedics and taken to the hospital in an ambulance.

In June 2012 an auction was held at the school, and no one recalls the money ever being seen or discussed. The principal would not allow any discussion of where the money went or was used, or the school budget at SLT meetings. The Chapter Leader transferred out.

On June 19, 2012, another teacher got upset at a little girl for asking for more food and yanked her really hard by the arm. Upon entering her classroom Natalya immediately called the office and was transferred to Ms Straughter. After telling her of the incident Ms Straughter sent the incident form via a student to Natalya's class with a blank incident form. She, and two other people, Ms Schatzman(para) and the cafeteria staff lady Betty wrote down what had occured. During her prep which was next period, she made copies and submitted her report to three people, including ms Marbury. After a few days Natalya was informed by the mother that ms Marbury had called and told her that Natalya pulled her daughters arm and that they were going to remove me from the building. The mother told ms Marbury, "Ms Gordon did NOT do that to my child, another teacher did. I took my child to the precinct and filed a police report and my daughter told the detective who did it".

Ms Marbury then filed an OSI REPORT that the reason she accused Natalya was because Natalya had failed to give her the incident report.

On June 26, 2012, during summer clean up, while carrying her things to her car, Natalya was approached by two men who threatened her not to come back into the building in September. When the school safety officer (who was already outside by the location of the incident), walked the frightened Ms. Gordon back inside the buildIng and to the main office, she (Ms. Gordon) was immediately thrown out if the building by Ms. Marbury. Ms. Gordon then went directly to the precinct to file a report.

In October, 2012 Natalya was summoned to a disciplinary meeting, for the June 26, 2012 incident, where Marbury now claimed Natalya was lying and in a confidential OEO report dated March 11, 2013 Marbury claimed that she was told by a wittness, "whose name Marbury could not recall" that Natalya was not threatened",(as written in the Confidential OEO notes) and after falsifying a NYC police report against Natalya, Marbury charged Natalya with a disciplinary letter to file. In this letter Marbury accused Natalya of "inappropriate behavior" in alleging that Marbury was responsible for these two men threatening her in order to "get back" at Principal Marbury for Principal Marbury's discipline of Ms. Sokolson-Gordon (OEO Case #0084/13, p. 4).

Oct 3, 2012: Natalya was given a third grade class she had never had before (she was supposed to have grade 5) , and as soon as the lesson began, AP Lafontant came in, telling her it was a walk through. After several minutes she left. The next day Natalya received a U "unsatisfactory" rating for the walk-through (which in reality was a "fly-by").

On October 17, 2012 a student began to throw objects and Natalya made many telephone calls for help (PS 329 does not have a SAVE room), but no one came to help. The child refused to stop and began to hit, curse, and scratch Natalya. A para was walking by and attempted to assist but the child ran off. She called the office once more and within a few minutes the safety officer came up and went to look for the child. Natalya filled out an incident report and called his mom, then gave the report to Ms Marbury and one to AP Lafontant.

A week later a student gave Natalya a manila envelope, which she left in her classroom
and did not look inside. Soon after, hurricane Sandy displaced everyone in the school. In January 2013 Natalya was summoned to a disciplinary meeting regarding the out of control child and was told that she was found guilty of pushing the child out of the room. She was given several witness statements. However when she found the original manila envelope, this contained student statements written in October which were totally different than the statements written by same students in January. The latter version became a charge for 3020-a. Natalya kept the original statements.

Nov 15, 2012: a student attempted to jump down the stairs while screaming "I am going to kill myself". Another teacher was coming up the stairs and tried to prevent this act, but Natalya told him she would carry the child to the office located two flights up, and asked him to take care of her class. He agreed. Upon entering the office Natalya asked for assistance and told Ms Straughter what happened. Suddenly Salema came from around the corner of the office, the child saw her, and started screaming. Salema grabbed the child by the legs and started pulling her into the office telling her to shut up and telling her "not in this building, you will not do this in this building" but the child wouldn't let go of the door frame as Salema was pulling her by her legs into the room. Natalya, afraid that if she let go of the child the child would hit the floor with her head. Natalya finally got the child to let go of the door and Salema pulled her into her office and slammed the door shut while yelling for the child to shut her mouth.

Natalya immediately wrote an incident report and gave it to AP Lafontant who then gave her a school form to write it in. She filled out the form and handed it in. Natalya reported this incident to OSI. (Dennis Boyles came to the school building in Feb 2013 to investigate and question the other teacher involved, but no report has been seen from OSI). On November 25, 2012 the teacher involved as well others were asked to write false statements about what happened. They refused, however, Salema Marbury never reported the incident properly, and therefore endangered the welfare of a special needs child. Marbury charged Natalya. As written in NY Post :On Jan. 31, Gordon was charged with yelling at and grabbing several students the previous year...

From December 21, 2012 to January 17, 2013 Natalya was given many disciplinary letters and unsatisfactory observation reports for observations that never took place. No one at the school or at the UFT would listen to her growing fear and despair.

On or about January 30-31 2013 Natalya was removed from her teaching duties and the school. She was put into the rubber room on the 12th floor of 49-51 Chambers Street where Michelle Nacht works, for a few days. Then she was moved to 65 Court Street, where Investigator Scott worked, and then Petrides Complex in Staten Island. On January 30, 2013 Salema Marbury filed a complaint on behalf of herself and Parent Coordinator Leah Depena with the DOE Office of Equal Opportunity ("OEO") charging Natalya with sexual harassment. A clear example of Salema Marbury's psychosis is wh

 
© 2003 The E-Accountability Foundation