Parent Advocates
Search All  
The goal of ParentAdvocates.org
is to put tax dollar expenditures and other monies used or spent by our federal, state and/or city governments before your eyes and in your hands.

Through our website, you can learn your rights as a taxpayer and parent as well as to which programs, monies and more you may be entitled...and why you may not be able to exercise these rights.

Mission Statement

Click this button to share this site...


Bookmark and Share












Who We Are »
Betsy Combier

Help Us to Continue to Help Others »
Email: betsy.combier@gmail.com

 
The E-Accountability Foundation announces the

'A for Accountability' Award

to those who are willing to whistleblow unjust, misleading, or false actions and claims of the politico-educational complex in order to bring about educational reform in favor of children of all races, intellectual ability and economic status. They ask questions that need to be asked, such as "where is the money?" and "Why does it have to be this way?" and they never give up. These people have withstood adversity and have held those who seem not to believe in honesty, integrity and compassion accountable for their actions. The winners of our "A" work to expose wrong-doing not for themselves, but for others - total strangers - for the "Greater Good"of the community and, by their actions, exemplify courage and self-less passion. They are parent advocates. We salute you.

Winners of the "A":

Johnnie Mae Allen
David Possner
Dee Alpert
Joan Klingsberg
Harris Lirtzman
Hipolito Colon
Jim Calantjis
Larry Fisher
The Giraffe Project and Giraffe Heroes' Program
Jimmy Kilpatrick and George Scott
Zach Kopplin
Matthew LaClair
Wangari Maathai
Erich Martel
Steve Orel, in memoriam, Interversity, and The World of Opportunity
Marla Ruzicka, in Memoriam
Nancy Swan
Bob Witanek
Peyton Wolcott
[ More Details » ]
 
LA's Push To Get Kids Into School is Not About the Money?
The fact that the LA schools would fold if parents homeschooled their children or held a general strike has nothing to do with the initiative to get the children into school at all costs?
          
July 9, 2004

Schools Push for Higher Attendance:
L.A. Unified officials hope to gain $29 million by cutting absence rate by one percentage point.
By Cara Mia DiMassa, Times Staff Writer

The Los Angeles Unified School District kicked off a new push to boost student attendance Thursday, a move that officials hope will bring at least $29 million in extra state revenue to the budget-crunched district.

The district aims to improve attendance through a public relations campaign and giving students with high attendance rates such incentives as special assemblies and field trips. In addition, individual campuses would share in any extra funds.

Overall, the nation's second-largest school district, which has about 750,000 students in kindergarten through 12th grade, reports an average daily attendance rate of 93.5%. Officials want to raise that to above 95%. However, attendance at high schools hovers around 90%, much lower than in other urban California school systems, district officials said. Each day, 30,000 middle and high school students in the Los Angeles district are absent.

Los Angeles schools Supt. Roy Romer said he hopes the effort will remind parents, students, teachers and the community of the academic and financial benefits of getting students to school. It is a matter, he said, "of having it first on our minds when we come to work every day."

Because the state funds schools based on average daily attendance - about $26 per student per day - increased attendance could bring a windfall to the district. Officials have promised to give schools that boost attendance half of the additional funds instead of putting them into the general fund.

While shooting for a two-percentage-point improvement in attendance, Romer and other officials have included a more conservative one-point increase, to 94.5%, in the 2004-05 budget.

Such an increase would bring $29 million in additional state revenue. Half already has been committed to balancing the district's bottom line.

Each one-point increase would require that each student in the district show up for two days more per year.

There is some doubt whether that goal is feasible. Jannelle Kuninec, an advisor to the school board on budget matters, called an improvement to 94.5% ambitious. "There is very little margin for error," she said, warning them against counting too much on the extra cash.

The board will consider a motion next week, proposed by members Marlene Canter and Jon Lauritzen, outlining more specific ways to boost attendance. Among the possibilities are expanded partnerships with law enforcement to reduce truancy, possible changes in the way student suspensions are carried out and allowing attendance to be a factor in grading.

Norm Morrow, principal of Thomas Jefferson High, said his school's recent emphasis on smaller learning groups has already improved attendance.

Teachers and administrators realize that there's "a big correlation between being in school and academic success," Morrow said. "And that's what we should be all about.... We'd love to get the [additional] money, but that isn't the issue. We just want to get kids in school. This is their ticket to a better quality of life in the future."

 
© 2003 The E-Accountability Foundation