Parent Advocates
Search All  
The goal of ParentAdvocates.org
is to put tax dollar expenditures and other monies used or spent by our federal, state and/or city governments before your eyes and in your hands.

Through our website, you can learn your rights as a taxpayer and parent as well as to which programs, monies and more you may be entitled...and why you may not be able to exercise these rights.

Mission Statement

Click this button to share this site...


Bookmark and Share












Who We Are »
Betsy Combier

Help Us to Continue to Help Others »
Email: betsy.combier@gmail.com

 
The E-Accountability Foundation announces the

'A for Accountability' Award

to those who are willing to whistleblow unjust, misleading, or false actions and claims of the politico-educational complex in order to bring about educational reform in favor of children of all races, intellectual ability and economic status. They ask questions that need to be asked, such as "where is the money?" and "Why does it have to be this way?" and they never give up. These people have withstood adversity and have held those who seem not to believe in honesty, integrity and compassion accountable for their actions. The winners of our "A" work to expose wrong-doing not for themselves, but for others - total strangers - for the "Greater Good"of the community and, by their actions, exemplify courage and self-less passion. They are parent advocates. We salute you.

Winners of the "A":

Johnnie Mae Allen
David Possner
Dee Alpert
Joan Klingsberg
Harris Lirtzman
Hipolito Colon
Jim Calantjis
Larry Fisher
The Giraffe Project and Giraffe Heroes' Program
Jimmy Kilpatrick and George Scott
Zach Kopplin
Matthew LaClair
Wangari Maathai
Erich Martel
Steve Orel, in memoriam, Interversity, and The World of Opportunity
Marla Ruzicka, in Memoriam
Nancy Swan
Bob Witanek
Peyton Wolcott
[ More Details » ]
 
A Baby Dies at Day Care, and a Mother Asks Why She Had to Leave Him So Soon
As he did most mornings of the 117 days of his life, the first thing Karl did that Monday morning in July was to give me a smile like sunlight. He lay in the bed for a while, between his dad and me, looking from one of us to the other, working himself up with gurgles of delight. That morning, which started the same as all his others, would be a little different, however: it was his mommy’s first day back at work.
          
   Amber Scorah and her son before his death   
A Baby Dies at Day Care, and a Mother Asks Why She Had to Leave Him So Soon
By AMBER SCORAH, NOVEMBER 15, 2015
New York Times
LINK

As he did most mornings of the 117 days of his life, the first thing Karl did that Monday morning in July was to give me a smile like sunlight. He lay in the bed for a while, between his dad and me, looking from one of us to the other, working himself up with gurgles of delight. That morning, which started the same as all his others, would be a little different, however: it was his mommy’s first day back at work.

In comparison with the other new mothers I knew, I felt lucky to have three months’ paid maternity leave after Karl was born. Most of the parents in my community had only weeks before they had to leave their babies to go back to work. But nonetheless, even with three months under our belts and Karl’s neck strong enough to hold himself up, I was uncomfortable with the idea of leaving him. I wanted to be his caregiver longer, until he was a bit bigger. I could see how our time together in this early infancy was of so much value, how being with me every day made him more and more comfortable navigating his new environment. I noticed how he looked to me to learn things and make sense of his world. I could tell how safe and secure he felt. Though it was a hard and tiring time, every minute with Karl felt like an investment in his current and future well-being. Not to mention I was hopelessly tickled with him.

As the end of my leave drew near, I asked my company for more time off, without pay. I was told by the HR department that there was no system in place that allowed for extending maternity leaves. I went higher up the chain. Just two more months? There was nothing that could be done. The only option would be to quit.

I contemplated it. By the time I paid for child care in New York City, I was barely making much take-home pay anyway. But what compounded the financial concern was that if I quit, I would lose our health insurance. Lee, my partner, works freelance and Karl was covered under my work insurance.

We are luckier than many: We sat down and did the math and maybe Lee’s wages could cover rent and food for a few months, but certainly not that as well as the cost of health insurance for a family of three, not to mention the portion we would be on the hook for in the case of a medical emergency. On top of that, I was very concerned about losing my job. I don’t have a degree, and though I’ve managed to carve out a position at a publishing company, the memory of the year I spent unemployed, trying unsuccessfully to get my résumé past the algorithms of online applications, loomed large. If I did it again, it would be with a little child in tow.

Lee’s quitting was out of the question. There was no way we could pay all our bills on my salary, which is lower than his.

So we did the best, most responsible-seeming thing we could think of. After a long search, many waiting lists, interviews and a great deal of angst, we settled on a day care near my workplace. With this day care, I could still go over at lunch and breastfeed Karl, and have a visit with him, so we would never be apart more than a few hours. And the day care was recommended by many moms I knew who had similar circumstances to mine. It felt like a loving, safe space for Karl.

I justified it a million ways, as one justifies when one has run out of alternatives. He is an only child and maybe he would like to play with these other children. There are other babies who have been there since they were 6 weeks old, and Karl is 15 weeks. He is strong and has never been sick a day in his life!. It’s not like he’s going to die!

But no matter how I tried to make myself feel better, it felt bad.

That Monday morning, Lee entertained Karl while I rushed to shower and get his things ready. I put Karl in his baby carrier and his dad and I headed into the city on the subway. I felt propelled down the street, swept into the train, carried along by a system that gave me no choice but to submit to the inevitability of any working mother of an infant in America. For Karl’s part, he was curious and unconcerned, looking around, smiling. In the subway car, someone offered me a seat, and I loosened the straps of the carrier, struggling to get my curious baby to focus on nursing. With this extra bit of subway feeding time, he could arrive with a full stomach. And this extra few minutes of nursing each day would help keep my milk supply up, now that I would be pumping my milk to fill bottles. I pulled up a baby blanket to block the man next to me from seeing my exposed breast on his morning commute.

We arrived at the day care by 9:30. The day-care assistant came to Karl with arms outstretched and said, “Hola!” Karl studied her face and flashed a big smile. The day-care owner told a joke that was probably told to all new parents dropping their babies off on the first day: The worst thing that could happen was he would get hit by a fire truck — since once a toddler had hit a baby with a toy truck on his first day. I felt reassured. This was what everyone did, how everyone felt.

I returned to the day care at 12:15 to nurse Karl. I was so excited to see him, I ran the two blocks there from the office. As I took the stairs by twos to the second floor, I noticed that the door to the day care was propped open. It seemed odd to me — that they would leave the door open, with so many toddlers inside. I walked around the corner, expecting to pick up my son, feel his chubby rolls, see his face light up at the sight of his mommy.

Instead, I saw my son unconscious, splayed out on a soft changing table. His lips and the area around his mouth were blue, and the day-care owner was performing CPR on him, incorrectly.

Our sweet son died two and a half hours after the first time I had left him.

Would Karl have died if he had been with me that morning? The medical examiner finished her report last week and the conclusion is: undetermined.

What is determined is that at 11:50 a.m. the day-care assistant saw my baby kicking his legs and brought it to the attention of the day-care owner. The day-care owner dismissed the assistant, telling her not to go over to check him. “Babies kick their legs in their sleep all the time,” she said. Twenty minutes later, my baby was dead. If the day-care assistant had gone over and picked him up, checked on him, would Karl be alive? I don’t know. The day-care owner had also put Karl down to sleep on his side, which is a known unsafe sleep position. Had he been put down on his back to sleep, would he be alive? I don’t know.

I will have to live with questioning this for the rest of my life.

What I do know is that had I been with my 3-month-old son, I would have gone over and checked on him at that moment. What I also know is that my son would have been safely on his back to sleep, if not sleeping on me, as he loved to do on all our days home together.

Regardless of the answers I will never have, the question I now ask is: Should parents have to play this roulette with their weeks-old infant? To do all they can possibly do to ensure that their baby is safe, only to be relying on a child-care worker’s competence or attentiveness or mood that day?

This article isn’t about day-care safety. This isn’t an indictment of the company I work for; I had one of the better parental leave policies of anyone I know. What this article is about is that my infant died in the care of a stranger, when he should have been with me. Our culture demanded it.

A mother should never have no choice but to leave her infant with a stranger at 3 months old if that decision doesn’t feel right to her. Or at 6 weeks old. Or 3 weeks old. I would have stayed home with Karl longer, but there just didn’t seem to be a way. And I knew well enough that a million other mothers in America before me had faced the same choice and had done the same, even earlier than I had, though it tortured them emotionally, or physically, to do so.

Of course, had I conceived in my wildest nightmare that leaving Karl might mean losing him, I would have sacrificed anything. I would have quit my job. I would have carried him around on my back collecting recycling cans and bottles. Endured any economic hardship. List all the wildest alternatives, you’re not coming up with anything that isn’t on my list of “if onlies.” But the sad truth is, even though I am possibly one of the world’s most imaginatively anxious mothers, I never thought of the possibility that my baby would die that morning. And no wonder, because unexplained infant death is rare, and parental leave in the vast majority of cases is not an issue of life and death. But I am now asking: Why, why does a parent in this country have to sacrifice her job, her ability to provide her child with proper health care —- or for many worse off than me, enough food to eat — to buy just a few more months to nurture a child past the point of vulnerability?

I wasn’t just up against the end of my parental leave. I was up against an entire culture that places very little value on caring for infants and small children. Parental leave reduces infant death, gives us healthier, more well-adjusted adults and helps women stay in the workforce. If we truly valued the 47 percent of the work force who are women, and the value of our families, things would look different. Mothers could go back to work after taking time off to recover physically from birth and bond with their young children. Health care could be available to bridge that return to work so that our children could get their wellness checkups and vaccinations.

Yes, it’s possible that even in a different system, Karl still might not have lived a day longer, but had he had been with me, where I wanted him, I wouldn’t be sitting here, living with the nearly incapacitating anguish of a question that has no answer.

There are plenty of good examples of how to create a national parental leave system that works. Our children can’t afford lobbyists. It’s up to us parents to demand more.

Amber Scorah is an editorial producer at Scholastic. She and her partner, Lee Towndow, recently launched www.forkarl.com, where visitors can contact their government representatives and presidential candidates to voice their opinion on family leave.

Like what you’re reading? Get the best of Motherlode articles, links, comments and conversation, along with previews of posts to come, delivered each week to your inbox.

Unlicensed SoHo Day Care Is Shut After Death of Infant Boy
By VIVIAN YEE, New York Times, JULY 14, 2015
LINK

The day care that Lee Towndrow and Amber Scorah chose for their 3-month-old son, Karl, seemed like a good match in a city where child care can cost as much as college tuition and waiting lists seem to offer only discouragement.

SoHo Child Care, in a painting-filled second-floor artist’s loft on Greene Street, offered healthy, organic snacks and lunches, immersion in Spanish, birthday parties and Halloween festivities. It was run by Maryellen Strautmanis, who had raised her own six children in the building, at 69 Greene Street, and had taken care of dozens of others since 2001.

“I have the utmost respect for each individual child,” she wrote on her website. “I endeavor through humor, flexibility and consistency, to make each day a joyful experience.”

Monday was Karl Towndrow’s first day at SoHo Child Care. A few hours after his mother dropped him off, he was dead.

A spokeswoman for the office of the city’s chief medical examiner, which performed an autopsy on Tuesday, said the office was conducting further studies to determine the cause of death.

By Tuesday, Ms. Strautmanis’s business had been ordered to shut down amid revelations that it had never been licensed — one of many unlicensed city day care centers that operate outside the law and come to regulators’ attention only when a child is hurt.

The city’s health department received a report of illegal child care activity at the Greene Street loft in November, but an inspector who visited the site could not confirm the allegation, Christopher Miller, a spokesman for the department, said on Tuesday. Workers at the business on the ground floor of the cream-colored building denied seeing any signs of a day care operation, and the inspector did not see any activity while watching the door, Mr. Miller said. No one answered the bell. Eventually, the complaint was dropped.

The department is stepping up efforts to track down unlicensed day care operators, Mr. Miller said, including searching online for listings and advertisements. Any provider that is found to be operating illegally is sent a cease-and-desist order, and inspectors follow up to make sure the site is closed.

Parents looking for child care for the first time often do not know that providers are supposed to be regulated, although awareness has grown in recent years, said Nancy Kolben, the executive director of the city-based Center for Children’s Initiatives. Instead, they may choose based on a center’s reputation among friends and other parents. And parents of infants and toddlers, for whom care is less widely available and more expensive than for older children, may be especially likely to choose an unlicensed option, she said.

“One of the things with a baby, often, is what’s most on the parent’s mind is: ‘Does this person seem warm and caring? Who’s going to be taking care of my child?’ ” Ms. Kolben said. “Those are all important things, but they should be part of a program that’s meeting the regulatory standards.”

New York has among the highest standards for regulating day care in the country, Ms. Kolben said. But she said the rules provided only a foundational framework that did not guarantee a high quality of care.

A 58-page document issued by the state’s Office of Children and Family Services outlines the regulations that SoHo Child Care would have had to follow to earn a license, including rules governing the training of day care employees, the number of meals children receive, the frequency with which bedding must be cleaned and the ratio of employees to children. The agency oversees day care centers throughout the state and contracts with the city’s health department to regulate those in the city.

All employees in licensed day care facilities are required to be trained in CPR and preventing sudden infant death syndrome.

Mr. Towndrow and Ms. Scorah, who live in an apartment in Brooklyn Heights, took Karl to SoHo Child Care after hearing about it from people who worked in SoHo, Robert K. Boyce, the Police Department’s chief of detectives, said.

Ms. Strautmanis, who lives in the 4,000-square-foot loft with her husband, mother-in-law and children, was caring for 15 children with three other employees, Mr. Boyce said. The children were as young as 3 months and as old as 3 years.

Posts on another SoHo Child Care parent’s blog spoke fondly of the activities and routines she offered: Ms. Strautmanis, her staff and the children dressed up for Halloween, and she brought out birthday cake for every child. She even tidied up one child’s haircut at his mother’s request.

The parent, Jacqui Cousin, wrote on the blog, “It is amazing to see how far” her son had come since starting day care. Ms. Strautmanis, originally from Canada, has weathered other times of turbulence. She and her husband, Vincent Strautmanis, had filed for bankruptcy in 2005. That same year, Mr. Strautmanis pleaded guilty to a charge of conspiracy to commit bank fraud for taking $950,000 from JP Morgan Chase Bank, according to court records. He was sentenced to a year and a day in federal prison, as well as three years of supervised release.

It was after Mr. Strautmanis’s company closed after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks that his wife began caring for the children of others in their loft, she said on her website. On Monday, Ms. Scorah, a writer who works on developing children’s educational products at Scholastic, had dropped her son off in the morning, planning to come back around noon to feed him. A worker at the day care fed him and put him down for a nap. Just before 12:15 p.m., she checked on him and found his lips blue. It was then that the police were called.

Karl was taken to Lenox Hill HealthPlex in Greenwich Village, where he was pronounced dead soon after. Reached by phone on Tuesday, Ms. Strautmanis declined to comment.

On Ms. Scorah’s Instagram account, Karl smiled in almost every photograph: Karl on the Brooklyn Heights Promenade, Karl outside the White House, Karl next to a sign advertising a book talk for the author Karl Ove Knausgaard. Ms. Scorah is an occasional contributor to Gothamist and other publications, and has been working on a book. Mr. Towndrow is a cinematographer, photographer and visual effects artist who shot parts of “Going Clear,” the HBO documentary about Scientology.

“Karl was beloved by his parents, who doted on him every moment,” read a statement released by the family on an online fund-raising page created by friends. “He was their joy and brought happiness to everyone who met him. His family and friends are grieving but are taking comfort in knowing they knew this sweet, innocent soul, even if it was all too brief.”

Al Baker, Sarah Maslin Nir and Ashley Southall contributed reporting. Elisa Cho contributed research.

 
© 2003 The E-Accountability Foundation